Victor James from the band Fans of Jimmy Century shares his experiences of transitioning from the ATEM Mini to YoloLiv products for their live streaming needs. If you’re in the market for a more efficient and user-friendly live streaming setup, this post is for you!
James delves into the limitations he faced with the ATEM Mini, particularly the need for an extra person to manage live switching and the dependence on additional software for multi-platform streaming. He narrates his research process that led him to discover YoloLiv products, specifically the YoloBox Pro and YoloLiv Instream, also known as YoloBox.
He provided a detailed comparison of the two systems, focusing on ease of use, flexibility and functionality.
Why YoloBox Pro and Instream?
1. Ease of Use
YoloLiv devices integrate everything into one box, eliminating the need for an external computer. They even support inserting a SIM card for internet access, which means you don’t have to rely on venue Wi-Fi.
2. Flexible Camera Setup
YoloLiv Pro supports up to three cameras (with the ability to connect another camera via USB), more than enough for his live streaming needs. The ability to switch between virtual cameras and pre-recorded videos adds to its versatility.
3. Auto-Switching Made Simple
The YoloLiv’s auto-switching feature is user-friendly. Unlike the ATEM Mini, which requires manual programming for switches, YoloLiv allows easy setup of auto-switching, with options to randomize sequences and adjust timings.
4. Multi-Platform Streaming
YoloLiv enables direct streaming to multiple platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram simultaneously without needing third-party software. This feature is a significant improvement over the ATEM Mini setup, which required additional software for multi-platform streaming.
5. Practical Applications with Fans of Jimmy Century
Using YoloLiv has transformed their live streaming process in their band, Fans of Jimmy Century. For instance, during a New Year’s show in Reno, the venue’s Wi-Fi was slow due to high traffic. With YoloLiv, they simply used a SIM card, ensuring a smooth live stream without relying on unstable venue Wi-Fi.
Comparing YoloLiv with ATEM Mini
1. Recording vs. Streaming Focus
James pointed out that while the ATEM Mini Pro ISO excels in recording individual tracks for post-production, YoloLiv is more focused on live streaming. Its built-in features are tailored for live production, reducing the need for extensive external restheirces.
2. Software and Hardware Requirements
The ATEM Mini setup required additional software like OBS for effective multi-platform streaming. In contrast, YoloLiv’s integrated system reduces the need for extra equipment, making it a more streamlined option for live streaming.
3. User Interface and Functionality
The YoloLiv user interface was praised for its simplicity and ease of use compared to the ATEM Mini. The ability to handle everything directly on the device, from switching to streaming, makes YoloLiv a more user-friendly option.
Summary
Their setup includes multiple cameras, an overhead shot, a side view, and inputs for their green screen effects. The picture-in-picture functionality is particularly useful for creating engaging live streams, allowing us to overlay videos and graphics seamlessly.
Switching to YoloLiv has been a game changer for their band. The ease of use, flexibility, and all-in-one functionality make it an ideal choice for live streaming. If you’re looking for a comprehensive live streaming solution that simplifies the process and enhances your production quality, he highly recommend YoloLiv.
Learn More About YoloBox / YoloBox Pro
https://www.yololiv.com/yoloboxPro
https://www.yololiv.com/hardware
2,360 total views, 7 views today
Penny is a passionate intern in the AV industry, contributing outstanding blog content to the YoloLiv team. She focuses on creating engaging and informative articles to help readers enhance their live streaming experience.
